This would be neither calibrated nor show split RGB, nor would it be at the full resolution of the signal, but it would give a consistent idea of exposure at least. I suspect I really can't afford to do this properly, and I'll end up with one of those iphone-sized pocket oscilloscopes from ebay hooked up to a composite downconvert. It's tricky, though I don't own a laptop with a suitable USB3 port, and the desktop one is insufficiently portable. Using your camera’s smartphone and Internet connection, Ultrascope will be able to snap pictures of all the objects you spot and. Back in a more achievable fiscal sphere, I'm looking more at the Blackmagic Ultrascope end of things. But there’s a lot more to it than just basic observation. In an ideal world, I'd have an Astro 3014, which is a fantastic piece of kit, but they go for nearly US$8k. Use a scope box to control the extent of any datum element such as grids, levels and reference planes. I want something that does an RGB parade, but I'm not that worried about what else it does - although most things that do a parade will also do a lot else. Buy a blackmagic mini recorder for 149, and for 250 total, you have accurate, responsive, customizable scopes. This is useful to me both as a camera accessory and when I'm engaging in what After Effects users call "Grading" and what Michael Most calls "harrumph!", so it's something I'd use very frequently. As confirmed by BMD, there is no passive pass through mode from input to thunderbolt to ultrascope software. There is also a sizable signal delay due to the processing. It's becoming increasingly worth my owning a waveform monitor. Ultrascope (in teranex) is always seeing a processed signal which makes it unsuitable as a standalone scope.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |